135
135
Jul 25, 2013
07/13
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 135
favorite 0
quote 0
the law of self-defense worked well for years and years an years. and i think there is a determination, and i was proud that both the attorney general and the president, as well as many others, have commented -- john mccain's words that these laws should be reviewed -- were also welcome, that there is a growing consensus that these laws are inconsistent with safe communities. our own poll shows race relations are, 50% of whites think race relations are fairly or very good, but only 38% of african-americans. you think that that's the impact of the verdict, partly? >> there's no doubt that the verdict has had an impact. it's, to some extent, affected people's confidence in the criminal justice system. i think that we've seen conflict and a lot of of tough language being played out indeed in the media. i remain optimistic and hopeful that reasonable minds, that people who are ready to understand that while we've come a great distance when it comes to race and race relations in this nation, in the 21st century there is a lot of unfinished work and that
the law of self-defense worked well for years and years an years. and i think there is a determination, and i was proud that both the attorney general and the president, as well as many others, have commented -- john mccain's words that these laws should be reviewed -- were also welcome, that there is a growing consensus that these laws are inconsistent with safe communities. our own poll shows race relations are, 50% of whites think race relations are fairly or very good, but only 38% of...
93
93
Jul 25, 2013
07/13
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 93
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> the impacts of sequestration, like the furloughs of 650,000 defense workers now, keep piling up, the pressure is going to grow among republicans to come to the table. >> reporter: about that jobs prediction, some leading republicans say employers are reluctant to hire with obama care on the horizon, and they know part-time employment is the growth area. bret? >> mike, thank you. >>> in our latest "it's all your money" segment, since the worst of the financial crisis, belt tightening has become popular again with individuals and families. most by necessity with fewer dollars coming in, less can be spent on frivolous things. but it's been a self-imposed necessity. a choice. well, now in california, those already struggling to get by may be forced, forced to live with even less now in hopes of having more in the future. we explain. >> thinking about retirement, they're thinking about today and i need my money to eat today, not to retire with. >> reporter: the california solution, force employers who don't offer retirement plans to withhold 3% of every worker's paycheck. >> mentally,
. >> the impacts of sequestration, like the furloughs of 650,000 defense workers now, keep piling up, the pressure is going to grow among republicans to come to the table. >> reporter: about that jobs prediction, some leading republicans say employers are reluctant to hire with obama care on the horizon, and they know part-time employment is the growth area. bret? >> mike, thank you. >>> in our latest "it's all your money" segment, since the worst of the...
84
84
Jul 25, 2013
07/13
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 84
favorite 0
quote 0
it's a limit on both the defense side and the non-defense side. but it's a limit. it's an attempt to control that which has been so difficult to control in this town, which is federal spending. now i should point out that even if we abide by the spending caps that are in the existing law -- so if we followed the law, we're still going to run a huge deficit. next year the deficit will be about $560 billion. that means next year, if we have the spending discipline of living within the law, we will still increase our total outstanding debt by more than $500 billion, and our debt as a percentage of our economy will rise to 76%. 76% debt to g.d.p. ratio is already -- our debt to g.d.p. ratio is already higher than it should be. it's already costing us economic growth in jobs. it's going to rise further, and that's assuming we stick to the spending cap. i should point out that the way we got to this point is just spending on auto pilot, just growing spending every year. i'll give you one example. since 2000, total federal spending has doubled. that's the scale of the inc
it's a limit on both the defense side and the non-defense side. but it's a limit. it's an attempt to control that which has been so difficult to control in this town, which is federal spending. now i should point out that even if we abide by the spending caps that are in the existing law -- so if we followed the law, we're still going to run a huge deficit. next year the deficit will be about $560 billion. that means next year, if we have the spending discipline of living within the law, we...
310
310
Jul 25, 2013
07/13
by
CNNW
tv
eye 310
favorite 0
quote 0
>> it's a legal defense with a lot of chutzpa. basically my fraud was all over the news and there were rumors of it. so it's a very interesting defense. >> but vanessa, he denied doping. >> and in this country, a lot of people believed his denials, of course, for so long. it's interesting that his lawrence are -- that they renewed sponsorship at a time when there were allegations about doping. most of them were covered in europe, but didn't really make their way to the united states. the postal service did in fact renew the sponsorship in november of 2000. even so, he issued the vehement denials, and the post appear service renewed its sponsorship, spending $40 million essentially to sponsor lance and the team. >> so they didn't exactly investigate these charges, right? >> no, they didn't. that's one of the things he as arted in his lawyer. look, the time to investigate this was actually years ago. there were allegations in the press, as vanessa said, there was an investigation going on in france to whether or not the team was dop
>> it's a legal defense with a lot of chutzpa. basically my fraud was all over the news and there were rumors of it. so it's a very interesting defense. >> but vanessa, he denied doping. >> and in this country, a lot of people believed his denials, of course, for so long. it's interesting that his lawrence are -- that they renewed sponsorship at a time when there were allegations about doping. most of them were covered in europe, but didn't really make their way to the united...
91
91
Jul 25, 2013
07/13
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 91
favorite 0
quote 0
joining us phillip snyder former prosecutor and john a former defense attorney. tell me whether or not they were informants both of these guys, why is that so critical, why is that being raised the way that it is? >> well the, james, jay carney's showing that steve rifle man phlegmy is lying and if he is lying about that what else is he lying about? contending that james bulger was not a informant or connected to the fbi whatsoever. discrediting him, prior inconsistent statements goes to his credibility and that is something the defense will use in the closing argument. rick: there is a history between those two guys and fbi, former corrupt agent, connelly, who is serving a 40-year sentence. this whole sort of side story, phillip. i wonder how much is a distract shin for the prosecution? >> it's a big distraction. in most cases you have their witnesses that are reputed as criminals that are testifying for the prosecution. however in this case the problem is that you have a reputed fbi agent who is serving 40 years in prison and that is going to be a big focus of
joining us phillip snyder former prosecutor and john a former defense attorney. tell me whether or not they were informants both of these guys, why is that so critical, why is that being raised the way that it is? >> well the, james, jay carney's showing that steve rifle man phlegmy is lying and if he is lying about that what else is he lying about? contending that james bulger was not a informant or connected to the fbi whatsoever. discrediting him, prior inconsistent statements goes to...
154
154
Jul 25, 2013
07/13
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 154
favorite 0
quote 0
geico's defensive driver, good student and multi-policy discounts could save you hundreds of dollus. engineer: uh geico's discounts could save you hundreds of "doll-ars." it sounds like you're saying "dollus." dollus. engineeif you could accentuate the "r" sound of "dollars." are...are... are... engineer: are... arrrrrr. arrrrr. someone bring me an eye patch, i feel like a bloomin' pirate. geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance. honestly, i feel like i nailed that. using night-vision goggles to keep an eye on my spicy buffalo wheat thins. who's gonna take your wheat thins? i don't know. an intruder, the dog, bigfoot. could you get the light? [ loud crash ] what is going on?! honey, i was close! it's a yeti! [ male announcer ] must! have! wheat thins! honey, i was close! it's a yeti! wait a sec! i found our colors. we've made a decision. great, let's go get you set up... you need brushes... you should check out our workshops... push your color boundaries while staying well within your budget walls. i want to paint something else. more saving. mo
geico's defensive driver, good student and multi-policy discounts could save you hundreds of dollus. engineer: uh geico's discounts could save you hundreds of "doll-ars." it sounds like you're saying "dollus." dollus. engineeif you could accentuate the "r" sound of "dollars." are...are... are... engineer: are... arrrrrr. arrrrr. someone bring me an eye patch, i feel like a bloomin' pirate. geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on...
109
109
Jul 25, 2013
07/13
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 109
favorite 0
quote 0
i think it is a defensible program. i think it's a necessary program but certainly there is question it raise ad lot of questions in the minds of the american people and we've had some of those questions answered i think, both from the president and then in congressional testimony from leaders of the intelligence community but i think people have a lot more questions and this debate that we're having is healthy. what we haven't seen the president do aside from his one brief appearance is lay this out and make the case as to why exactly this is necessary. i think he is ought to do that, if he believes that we need to continue these programs an white house is on the record saying that they do, we need to hear from the president exactly what kind of threats we're facing and exactly how these are likely to be thwarted by the continuation of these programs. bill: thank you. peter king up next hour for that very topic. he voted against the amendment and keep the nsa program in place. stephen hayes, our north star shining brig
i think it is a defensible program. i think it's a necessary program but certainly there is question it raise ad lot of questions in the minds of the american people and we've had some of those questions answered i think, both from the president and then in congressional testimony from leaders of the intelligence community but i think people have a lot more questions and this debate that we're having is healthy. what we haven't seen the president do aside from his one brief appearance is lay...